Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Federal Jurisdiction

The 14th Amendment has been promoted to you as a great ratification to the Constitution in that it would protect all people’s rights.  You can find all the court decisions concerning this Amendment on the federal government’s website (GPO – Government Printing Office – FDSYS).  The additional information concerning the court decisions relating to this Amendment that you find on the government’s website is the basis for all the controlled media’s propaganda.  What you won’t find on the government’s website is anything to do with the actual reason for the 14th Amendment.

As my previous post “The Bankers’ Blueprint to Destroy American Sovereignty”( http://wp.me/pCW6e-7h ) exposed, immediately after the ink dried on the Declaration of Independence, Great Britain’s bankers were instructed to slowly take over America.  The real reason for implementing the 14th Amendment was to be able to create a way for Great Britain’s bankers to use the federal government’s foreign commerce clause to gain jurisdiction over all Americans.  The world’s banking headquarters is in London, England.

The United States Code is a collection of the organic laws of the United States – the organic laws of the United States are, in order, as follows:  the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Northwest Ordinance, the Constitution and its Amendments, and then the United States Code Titles 1 through 51.  From Great Britain’s viewpoint the main tenet of the Declaration of Independence that “All men are created equal” could not be allowed to stand.  The Constitution is subordinate to the Declaration of Independence and so it only grants the federal government jurisdiction over foreign commerce, interstate commerce, and trade with the Indians.  The Constitution does not and cannot grant the federal government any jurisdiction over the individual because of the overlying tenet that “All men are created equal”.  That’s why the Constitution does not and cannot grant the federal government intrastate jurisdiction (human action) – sovereignty lies with the individual.  Such a circumstance was intolerable to Great Britain – monarchs have no use for freedom.  Great Britain’s monarchy has never given up on collecting its taxes as it tried to exact under the Stamp Act and the Townshend Act.  That’s why Great Britain sent in its duplicitous bankers.

The 14th Amendment states in Section 1:  “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”.  I have imbedded the 14th Amendment here.

The 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment

Notice that this section includes the clause “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” – the jurisdiction of the federal government.  As noted above the federal government has no jurisdiction over the individual – the Constitution does not and cannot grant the federal government any intrastate commerce jurisdiction because of the main tenet of the Declaration of Independence that “All men are crated equal”.  Likewise, no Amendment to the Constitution can override the Declaration of Independence’s tenet that “All men are created equal”.

So how can someone born in one of the States as a free, sovereign American become subject to the limited jurisdiction of the federal government?

The sovereign American has no relationship with the federal government.  Only the very few crimes listed in the Constitution, such as kidnapping across State lines, counterfeiting, treason, piracy on the high seas, etc. as specifically set forth therein could apply to a sovereign American.

The citizen of the United States described in the 14th Amendment has been referred to as the “14th Amendment Citizen”, but that’s not explaining anything.

The connection to the 14th Amendment is found in the very first part of the implementing regulations of title 26 CFR, “Internal Revenue” at 26 CFR 1.1-1(c) where it states, in part, as follows:  “Who is a citizen.  Every person born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen.  For other rules governing the acquisition of citizenship, see chapters 1 and 2 of title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401-1459).”.  So there is the same type of wording as in the 14th Amendment – a citizen born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction.  And then this regulation goes on to say that the acquisition of citizenship is under the Immigration and Nationality Act which is codified in title 8 USC.  Title 8 USC is “Aliens and Nationality” – there is no connection to a sovereign American in the Immigration and Nationality Act.  There is no nexus between a sovereign American and title 8 USC, “Aliens and Nationality”.

Digging further into the statutes in the United States Code within Title 26, “Internal Revenue Code”, one finds the following:  section 2208, “Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States”, which states as follows:  “A decedent who was a citizen of the United States and a resident of a possession thereof at the time of his death shall, for purposes of the tax imposed by this chapter, be considered a ‘‘citizen’’ of the United States within the meaning of that term wherever used in this title unless he acquired his United States citizenship solely by reason of (1) his being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or (2) his birth or residence within such possession of the United States.”; and also section 2501, “Imposition of tax”, subsection (b), “Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States”, which states as follows:  “A donor who is a citizen of the United States and a resident of a possession thereof shall, for purposes of the tax imposed by this chapter, be considered a ‘‘citizen’’ of the United States within the meaning of that term wherever used in this title unless he acquired his United States citizenship solely by reason of (1) his being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or (2) his birth or residence within such possession of the United States.  These are both rather round about definitions.  Section 2208 is within the estate tax statutes and so concerns the decedent, while section 2501 is within the gift tax statutes and so concerns the donor.  However, both of the above statutes state that this is what is referred to as a “U.S. citizen” wherever used in the title of the Internal Revenue Code so the 14th Amendment citizen is legally known as a “U.S. citizen”.   It is necessary to look to the implementing regulations of the above statutes in the Code of Federal Regulations to find an example that actually clarifies what is such a citizen.

The Code of Federal Regulations was written in the mid-1930’s during the official bankruptcy proceedings of the federal government.  Title 11 United States Code (USC), “Bankruptcy” is implemented by title 11 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), “Federal Elections” – this evidences that our federal elections are nothing but the election of a bankruptcy “administration”.  Technically, the federal government known as “The United States of America” is a corporation.  Within the Internal Revenue statutes all “U.S. residents” are deemed to be “U.S. shareholders” (see 26 USC section 958(b) concerning constructive ownership).  Since the bankruptcy of the federal government, the States have been reduced to nothing but accounts of the bankruptcy.  Title 4 USC, “Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States”, is implemented by title 4 CFR, “Accounts”.  To see more evidence of the federal government’s bankruptcy see “The United States Doesn’t Own the Mississippi River” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-5X on this Blog.

The statute noted above at 26 USC 2501(b), “Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States”, is implemented by 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c) and actually has an example of what constitutes a “U.S. citizen” as follows:

“Example.  A, a citizen of the United States by reason of his birth in the United States at San Francisco, established residence in Puerto Rico and acquired Puerto Rican citizenship.  A makes a gift of stock of a Spanish corporation on September 4, 1958, while a citizen and domiciliary of Puerto Rico. A’s gift is, by reason of the provisions of section 2501(b) subject to the tax imposed by section 2501 inasmuch as his United States citizenship is based on birth in the United States and is not based solely on being a citizen of a possession or solely on birth or residence in a possession.”.

Now who in his right mind would give up his sovereignty to acquire U.S. possession citizenship and become subject to the federal government’s jurisdiction?

Well, the answer is that we’ve all been conned into doing that – it’s the Birth Certificate.  Remember, a sovereign American has no interface with the limited jurisdiction of the federal government.  So any document that you sign with the federal government (or with one of the States, the federal government’s accounts) can only be associated within the federal government’s limited jurisdiction.  The federal government is just a bunch of other Americans, so the only way a federal bureaucrat has any jurisdiction over some other American is if that American entered into some contract with the federal government.  The Birth Certificate establishes a residence in Puerto Rico and, further, acquires Puerto Rican citizenship.  This makes you property of the federal government as the Constitution in Article IV, Section 3 states as follows:  “The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States;”.  U.S. possession citizens are considered property of the federal government.  As well, U.S. possession citizens are considered as foreigners, since the possessions have not ratified the Constitution and become States under the Union.  Now don’t expect that anyone is supposed to know this – your representatives and senators are just other Americans that have been unknowingly subjugated by Great Britain’s bankers (counterfeiters).  Federal government bureaucrats don’t have a clue as to any of this, either.

So this is how someone who is born in one of the States becomes subject to the federal government as stated in the 14th Amendment.  The Birth Certificate destroys an American’s sovereignty by making him into a “U.S. citizen” – a person born in one of the States who then establishes a residence in Puerto Rico and, further, acquires Puerto Rican citizenship,

You may be wondering how I have come up with all of this information.  In 2001 I was the victim of a malicious prosecution by the United States government.  One of the first things that the Department of Justice prosecutor (Assistant District Attorney) had to do was enter my Birth Certificate into the proceedings as an exhibit.  By so doing the Department of Justice notified the judge that I was a “U.S. citizen” subject to the federal government’s jurisdiction – of course, at the time, I had no idea of what this meant and neither did the jury.  We’ve all become accustomed to having a Birth Certificate without understanding exactly what it portrays.  But the federal courts are notifying you of their limited jurisdiction by the gold-fringed flag in the courtroom.  Remember, the federal government has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce since an American is sovereign, so any trial in a federal court is under the flag of the government’s limited jurisdiction – the gold-fringed flag.  A lot of people have mistaken this gold-fringed flag to infer that the federal government is proceeding in a military fashion, but it actually represents foreign commerce.  Obviously, Great Britain’s bankers have total control over the Department of Justice and the federal courts.

Now as I have evidenced on other Posts within this Blog (see “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-6N ), there is only one connection between an American and the I.R.S. – title 26 section 3121, “Definitions”, subsection (l), “Agreements entered into by American employees with respect to foreign affiliates”, paragraph (1), “Agreement with respect to certain employees of foreign affiliate”.  This paragraph states, in part, as follows:  “The Secretary shall, at the American employer’s request, enter into an agreement (in such manner and form as may be prescribed by the Secretary) with any American employer (as defined in subsection (h)) who desires to have the insurance system established by title II of the Social Security Act extended to service performed outside the United States in the employ of any 1 or more of such employer’s foreign affiliates (as defined in paragraph (6)) by all employees who are citizens or residents of the United States,”.  The implementing regulations are at 26 CFR Part 36, “Contract coverage of employees of foreign subsidiaries”.  This states, in part, as follows:  “(a) In general, (1) Any  domestic corporation having one or more foreign subsidiaries may request the Internal Revenue Service to enter into an agreement for the purpose of extending the Federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance system established by title II of the Social Security Act …”.

Note that this statute is about extending F.I.C.A. to employees of an American employer’s foreign affiliates.  Again, Great Britain’s bankers have deceptively used the Social Security Form SS-5 as a federal employment form.  From the perspective of the federal government’s jurisdiction (which is solely over the U.S. possessions and Washington, D.C.) the rest of America is foreign.

So the statute above concerning extending F.IC.A. to employees of an American employer’s foreign affiliates is the connection between an American and the I.R.S. – when you filled out the government’s Form SS-5 to apply for Social Security, you became a “taxpayer” (see 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5) or go to “The Social Security Scam” at http://wp.me/PCW6e-E ), a member of the Merchant Marine, in other words, a federal employee.  The Form SS-5 has blocks to check if you are a “U.S citizen”, or a type of alien – thus it is within the government’s foreign commerce jurisdiction.  F.I.C.A. and the self-employment tax are U.S. possession taxes (see 26 USC section 7655) – remember the federal government has no jurisdiction within the states – no intrastate commerce jurisdiction, so these taxes have to apply within its limited jurisdiction.  The underlying implementing regulations for the income tax statutes are within title 27 CFR (again, see “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-6N ).  At title 27 CFR Part 26.11, “Meaning of terms” are the following:  “Revenue Agent. Any duly authorized Commonwealth Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico.  Secretary. The Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico.  Secretary or his delegate. The Secretary or any officer or employee of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico duly authorized by the Secretary to perform the function mentioned or described in this part.”.

This is where the Internal Revenue Service is – Puerto Rico.  That is where your Birth Certificate establishes your residence and citizenship.  The federal government has very limited jurisdiction, so Great Britain’s bankers have been extremely deceptive in their bankruptcy plans.  By slowly indoctrinating generation after generation of Americans with seemingly ever more federal government jurisdiction, the Communist inspired income tax has been implemented, along with all the other endless federal bureaucracies that impose regulations on Americans.  The Constitution has given the federal government no infrastructure to impose any regulatory agency over a sovereign American, so the 14th Amendment was ratified to entrap Americans into the bankers’ foreign commerce web of deceit.

But that’s not all the 14th Amendment did.  Remember, Great Britain’s bankers were sent here to exact the taxes that our forefathers refused to pay.  Section 4 of the 14th Amendment states, in part, as follows:  “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”  This is the next key part of the 14th Amendment as far as the international bankers (counterfeiters) are concerned.  This allows them to continue to print money for the government and then no one can question the debt.

Section 4 of the 14th Amendment is what allowed the Federal Reserve to issue its QE programs where it printed more and more Federal Reserve Notes and paid all of its banking cronies.  Without the devious underlying law relating to the Birth Certificate we Americans would not have our hard earned money taken from us and, further, we would not be subject to a mountainous federal debt.  But that is exactly what the bankers set in place.

In essence, the federal government is a bankrupt entity (to the bankers of the Federal Reserve) that is proceeding forward under the foreign commerce clause wherein the government has sovereignty as granted by the Constitution.  Great Britain’s bankers (counterfeiters – printing pieces of paper backed by nothing but debt) have bankrupted the federal government and created their make-believe world through their duplicitous Birth Certificate and Social Security Form SS-5 wherein all Americans have established a residence in Puerto Rico and, further, have acquired Puerto Rican citizenship, and then joined the Merchant Marine and become federal employees.  It is necessary to first have the Birth Certificate that makes you into a “U.S. citizen” (an American who has established a residence in Puerto Rico and, further, acquired Puerto Rican citizenship) in order to apply for a Social Security number since F.I.C.A. is a U.S. possession tax (title 26 USC section 7655).  The combination of the government’s terms of “U.S. citizen” and “taxpayer” is legally known as a “U.S. resident” (see more at “The U.S. Resident” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3g ).  There is no box labeled “American” to select on the Social Security number application Form SS-5, only “U.S. citizen” and various “Alien” categories.  This explains how the federal government can grant Social Security to illegal aliens, as it has complete sovereignty to do as it pleases under foreign commerce.  This explains why the Supreme Court ruled that it always had the power to exact an income tax and that the government was granted no new jurisdiction – the income tax applies under foreign commerce which can only apply to an American who has become a “U.S. citizen” (see more on the 16th Amendment at “The Supreme Court Decisions” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a ).  In fact, the 14th Amendment has allowed the federal courts to rule over U.S. citizens and U.S. possession citizens, thus making it appear that the federal government has jurisdiction over all Americans in direct defiance of the commerce jurisdiction granted by the Constitution.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is nothing more than an extension of Social Security.  So it can only apply to the bankers’ make-believe world of the “U.S. resident” (combination of “U.S. citizen” and “taxpayer”).  It is technically Public Law 111-148, 124 Stat 119 enacted by Congress on March 23, 2010.  The overwhelming majority of the sections of this law have been incorporated within title 42, “The Public Health and Welfare”, sections 301 through 1397jj, which is Social Security, and within title 26, “The Internal Revenue Code”, which only exists, as concerns an American, to extend Social Security to “U.S. citizens”.  Most of the rest of it is incorporated at title 42 sections 18001 through 18204.

There was a recent Supreme Court decision wherein it was held that a corporation was a “U.S. person”.  This is one more indication that the federal government is proceeding under foreign commerce as it does not have any jurisdiction over intrastate commerce.  Title 26 USC section 7701, “Definitions”, subsection (a), paragraph (1), “Person”, includes a corporation along with a trust, estate, partnership, association, and company.  Internal revenue is foreign commerce.  It is a subset of the customs.  Customs collects revenue for the government from importing duties from foreign countries, while internal revenue collects revenue for the government from importing duties from U.S. possessions, thus, a form of “internal revenue” from the government’s perspective.  Since “internal revenue” is within the customs, the U.S. possessions are defined as foreign countries within the Internal Revenue Code, for example; 26 USC Sec. 865(i)(3), Sec. 872(b)(7), and Sec. 2014(g).  This is necessary to consider “internal revenue” as foreign commerce.  The federal government owns the U.S. possessions and may designate them in any fashion that suits it.

The federal government only has the three types of commerce jurisdiction as granted in the Constitution from Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 – “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes”.  Each of the three commerce jurisdictions is cited separately under title 28, “Judiciary and Judicial Procedure”, chapter 85, “District Courts; jurisdiction”. The cite to section 1336, “Surface Board Transportation orders”, which was renamed from “Interstate Commerce Commission’s orders” in 1995, is the interstate commerce part of the commerce clause.  The cite to section 1362, “Indian tribes”, is obviously the trade with the Indians part of the commerce clause.  The cite to section 1340, “Internal revenue; customs duties” is the foreign commerce part of the commerce clause.  The free, sovereign American has no nexus with the Federal government’s commerce jurisdiction, but in the bankers’ make-believe world all “U.S. residents” are subject to its jurisdiction under foreign commerce, as well, as being federal employees.

The 14th Amendment’s use of the Birth Certificate to turn all sovereign Americans into “U.S. citizens” is also the basis of the United States’ membership in the United Nations.  By definition, all treaties entered into with another country, or multiple countries, is within foreign commerce.  So even though the Constitution includes treaties as the law of the land, no treaty can at anytime affect anything to do with a sovereign American as there is no infrastructure to impose any regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over intrastate commerce.  Treaties can only extend the federal government’s jurisdiction within foreign commerce, which, thanks to Great Britain’s bankers’ duplicitous Birth Certificate, now affects all Americans.

Here’s another indication of how the U.S. government moves forward.  Title 48 USC, “Territories and Insular Possessions” is implemented by title 48 CFR, “Federal Acquisition Regulations System”.  How about that?  This is as straightforward as can be – the federal government is acquiring more and more property and revenue from everyone through the laws that apply in the territories and possessions.  The devious use of the Birth Certificate to implement the 14th Amendment has turned Americans into “U.S. citizens” – citizens of the possessions.

When a monarchy is involved in any contract, the progeny of the monarchy is always included.  Therefore, as time has gone by, whoever the current monarch is doesn’t matter as the monarchy continues in a similar fashion as corporations.  This has allowed Great Britain’s bankers to continue the slow subjugation of America for as long as it takes.

I will be writing a Post on this Blog about my aforementioned malicious prosecution in the very near future.  What the government’s actions revealed during my malicious prosecution is that the I.R.S. only has authority to collect one income tax – F.I.C.A.  If you pay your F.I.C.A. as you contracted to do when you applied for a Social Security number, the IRS has no further authority to collect the regular income tax.  My Post will evidence the felonies committed by the federal government in my malicious prosecution in order to hide that fact – I have several Freedom of Information Act responses that evidence that the government suborned perjury, committed perjury, and falsified government records in Social Security.  The government has always stated that the income tax is voluntary – well, it is and it is the first way in which we Americans can begin to restore our rightful status by actually following their duplicitous law.  The perjured testimony given by the I.R.S.’s Custodian of Records in my trial actually let the cat out of the bag, so to speak.  Specifically, this testimony expressed the fact that the I.R.S. must have a transaction code 150 before it can do anything (this is referring to an individual’s computer tax transcripts).  A transaction code 150 represents a Virgin Island tax liability.  I will elaborate more on this on my future Post coming soon.

The bottom line is that without the ratification of the 14th Amendment, we Americans could not have been enslaved.

I have put together a memorandum that exposes the real history of the United States based on the actual laws, statutes, regulations, and other official documents.  I have titled it “The United States Doesn’t Own the Mississippi River”.  This does include my Post on this Blog of the same title, but goes much, much further.  What we have been led to believe is a fairytale meant to keep us in the dark about what is really going on behind the scenes.

You will learn that the Civil War was preplanned long ago.  Learn what the “Union” actually means.  Find out why Social Security is headquartered in Baltimore, while all other federal agencies are headquartered in Washington, D.C.  You will see that the “taxpayer” paid for 9/11.  Nearly everything that has happened in America was preplanned long ago.

Here’s the order form:

Order Form