You have been told that Social Security is an insurance program run by the federal government. You were led to believe that your income would be taxed at a certain rate for the cost of the program. Then in times of medical emergency or upon retirement you would be eligible for Social Security benefits. On the surface, this would seem to be an equitable arrangement.
But the federal government failed to fully inform you as to all of the other ramifications of applying for a Social Security number. For instance, did you know that you became a federal employee? Well, you did – specifically you became a member of the Merchant Marine. You also became an employee of a corporation that is involved with importing to and from the U.S. possessions. Another consideration is that if FICA is based upon a percentage of your earnings, then the government has somehow been granted the right to know the amount of your income and the sources of your income – this is not a hallmark of freedom. These statements and more will be evidenced by the actual federal statutes and regulations further on this page.
Like all great magicians, the federal government has you looking at the obvious while hiding the basis of the trick that the magician is performing right in front of your eyes.
Lots of Americans have questioned the legitimacy of the personal income tax, but it seems that everyone just loves the Social Security program. Social Security is the sacred cow that no one is ever supposed to criticize. Oh, sure, some claimants of Social Security find fault with what claims are denied or only partially funded. And lots of people are now pointing out that Social Security is not going to be solvent in the near future. But up till now no one has questioned the legitimacy of the Social Security program. Well, that time has come.
Americans now live in a country with the largest government in the world. Since the Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land and it states that “all men are created equal”, why would free, equal people need such a large government?
How did a country in which “all men are created equal” (and, of course, women) end up subservient to a multitude of federal government agencies? If all Americans are created equal, how can some bureaucrat from the EPA regulate how an American’s land is to be used? How can some bureaucrat from the FDA regulate what an American can choose for healthcare? How can some bureaucrat from the SEC regulate how an American can invest money? How can some bureaucrat from the IRS regulate how much of an American’s money the federal government can take? How can some bureaucrat within the Department of Labor dictate what an American may pay his employees? How can some bureaucrat within the Department of Education determine what an American’s children must be taught?
A real crime consists of a victim and a perpetrator. The perpetrator has either initiated force or fraud against the victim. This means that the victim’s rights have been violated. The two sides are drawn in this type of scenario and the laws against theft, murder, rape, etc. are clear. A court action may be initiated and the jury may deliberate after hearing all of the testimony. This upholds the premise that “all men are created equal”.
But when some federal government agency files a complaint against an American, what is the basis of the crime? The federal agency simply cites some regulation that the American violated – no victim is identified, no one’s rights have been violated. This does not uphold the premise that “all men are created equal”, but presumes that the federal government, through some bureaucratic agency, can force an American to do its bidding. How did this happen? The answer is buried deep in the Social Security scam. Applying for a Social Security number is tantamount to begging to be subservient to the federal government.
The following is somewhat complicated because it is the actual basis of the federal laws. After all, it’s not easy to subjugate an entire nation of free, sovereign people. But everything that I’ve written above will be legally verified and the actual basis of the regulations and statutes will be evidenced.
This site will forever end the conflict between the various “tax honesty movement” groups and the enforcement of the internal revenue laws. First of all, when dealing with the federal government of the United States, one must learn the definitions of the government’s legal “terms”. So let’s start with the definition of the term “taxpayer”.
From the regulations that implement the Internal Revenue Code, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), are the following:
“26 CFR Sec. 2.1(m) The terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as in chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
“26 CFR Sec. 2.1-1, Definitions
(a) As used in the regulations in this part, except as otherwise expressly provided –
(1) Act means the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 27)
(2) Section means one of the sections of the regulations in this part.
(5) Taxpayer means a citizen who has established or seeks to establish a construction reserve fund under the provisions of section 511 of the Act and the regulations in this part, and may include a partnership.
(b) Insofar as the computation and collection of taxes are concerned, other terms used in the regulations in this part, except as otherwise provided, have the same meaning as in the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.”
Now since the regulation above at 26 CFR Sec. 2.1(m) states that the terms used in this section have the same meaning as in chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, the definition of the term “taxpayer” from 26 CFR Sec. 2.1-1(a)(5) has the same meaning as in chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. And since 26 CFR Sec. 2.1-1(b) states insofar as the computation and collection of taxes are concerned, the definition of “taxpayer” from 26 CFR Sec. 2.1-1(a)(5) has the same meaning as in the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations that implement the Code.
The number “26” from the cites above is the number of the title, in this case title 26 is “internal revenue”. The number before the “.” from the cites above is the part number under the title, in this case “2”. The first number after the “.” from the cites above is the section number, in this case “1”. Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, referenced within the first of the above regulations, has to do with income tax.
The definition of the term “taxpayer” proves that a “taxpayer” is a federal employee, specifically within the Merchant Marine. Federal employment taxes only apply to federal employees. Did you know the definition of “taxpayer”? You must understand that when the government defines a “term” it no longer has anything to do with the original definition of the word as found in a dictionary.
The only definitions of “taxpayer” within chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code are at 26 USC Sec. 1313(b) and 26 USC Sec. 7701(a)(14). Both of these definitions vaguely define a “taxpayer” as someone subject to an internal revenue tax, but what “internal revenue” itself is remains unsaid.
Then what exactly is “internal revenue”? “Internal revenue” is a specific part of the customs. Customs derives revenue from the collection of duties on importing (and tonnage, the impact of a vessel on the harbor and wharves) from foreign countries. Internal revenue derives revenue from the collection of duties on importing within the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws – the U.S. possessions and the coasting trade. Any court action concerning internal revenue is brought under the statute at title 28 USC , “Judiciary and Judicial Procedure”, Chapter 85, “District Courts; jurisdiction”, section 1340, “Internal revenue; customs duties” based upon revenue from the collection of duties on imports. This is derived from the foreign commerce clause. It is from within title 19, “Customs duties”, Sec. 1317, “Tobacco products; supplies for certain vessels and aircraft”, where the location of the definition of the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws is cited. This section within title 19, “Customs duties”, concerns exporting certain products and states that internal revenue laws include importing. The actual citation to the definition of the jurisdiction of internal revenue laws is within the link to my court case document further along in this page. (For more information concerning “internal revenue”, see the post titled “Internal Revenue Jurisdiction” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3Z on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog).
Why would the government presume that the I.R.S. can contact a citizen and label that citizen a “taxpayer”? The definition of “taxpayer” (at 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5) as cited above) is a federal employee, within the Merchant Marine.
This is where Social Security comes into play. The federal government only has the three types of commerce jurisdiction as granted in the Constitution from Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 – “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes”. Each of the three commerce jurisdictions is cited separately under title 28, “Judiciary and Judicial Procedure”, chapter 85, “District Courts; jurisdiction”. The cite to section 1336, “Surface Board Transportation orders”, which was renamed from “Interstate Commerce Commission’s orders” in 1995, is the interstate commerce part of the commerce clause. The cite to section 1362, “Indian tribes”, is obviously the trade with the Indians part of the commerce clause. And as listed above, the cite to section 1340, “Internal revenue; customs duties” is the foreign commerce part of the commerce clause. The free, sovereign American has no nexus with the Federal government’s commerce jurisdiction.
From the Internal Revenue Code is the following:
“Title 26 U.S.C. section 7655, Cross references
(a) Imposition of tax in possessions
For provisions implementing tax in possessions, see-
(1) Chapter 2, relating to self-employment tax
(2) Chapter 21, relating to the tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act.”
Thus, as evidenced in the cross-references section above, the self-employment tax and FICA are possession taxes. They are also federal employment taxes, in other words, taxes imposed upon federal employees.
Since FICA is a possession tax, a free, sovereign American is not eligible for Social Security. Only citizens having U.S. citizenship within a U.S. possession would qualify for FICA.
The next term that one needs to learn is that of “U.S. citizen”. A person born in one of the sovereign states is not subject to the federal government unless that person commits one of the federal crimes listed in the Constitution, such as treason, counterfeiting, kidnapping across state lines, etc. The fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution defines a “U.S. citizen” as “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” A person born in one of the sovereign states is not subject to the limited jurisdiction of the federal government. After all, the Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land, superceding the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation, and it states that “all men are created equal”. To be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States requires U.S. possession citizenship. This is confirmed in the Internal Revenue Code at title 26 USC Sec. 2208 concerning estate taxes, 26 USC Sec. 2501(b) concerning gift taxes, and 26 CFR Sec. 1.932-1 concerning income taxes. Both 26 USC Sec. 2208 and 26 USC Sec. 2501(b) define the term “United States citizen” “wherever used in this title”. The regulations under 26 USC Sec. 2501 exemplify exactly what is meant by the statutes at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c). A “U.S. citizen” is someone born in one of the sovereign states who then establishes a residence in Puerto Rico and further acquires Puerto Rican citizenship. Now I know of no one born in one of the sovereign States who would ever voluntarily acquire US possession citizenship (even if that American had a winter home there) – why would anyone give up sovereignty to become subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government? It’s obvious that the real objective of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was not to guarantee anyone’s rights – it was to subjugate all Americans to the federal government’s hidden agenda by being able to use the term “U.S. citizen” in contracts and legal decisions. This also allowed the government to write laws and make court decisions that distinguish between U.S. possession citizens and “U.S. citizens”, making it appear that the federal government had jurisdiction over all Americans. But the key is that an American (anyone born in one of the sovereign States) is not a “U.S. citizen” (unless that American actually established a residence in a U.S. possession and further acquired U.S. possession citizenship). The next time you are asked if you are a “U.S. citizen”, just say “no”. For more on the 14th Amendment go to “The 14th Amendment Destroyed America’s Sovereignty” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-7B .
As stated above, “internal revenue” is a specific part of customs. Customs concerns foreign commerce. Since “internal revenue” is within the customs, the U.S. possessions are defined as foreign countries within the Internal Revenue Code, for example; 26 USC Sec. 865(i)(3), Sec. 872(b)(7), and Sec. 2014(g). This is necessary to consider “internal revenue” as foreign commerce. The federal government owns the U.S. possessions and may designate them in any fashion that suits it. However, as will be evidenced within this page and the link to the court document herein, the reason that the U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries is to foment the personal income tax dispute while ignoring the cause – Social Security.
So the question remains, how could a sovereign American ever be eligible for Social Security? This is where the concept of “Agreements entered into by American employers with respect to foreign affiliates” comes into play as defined at title 26 USC Section 3121(l). An “American employer” (defined at 26 USC Section 3121(h)) is further defined under 26 USC Section 3121(l) as having a foreign subsidiary and that wants to extend the insurance system established by title II of the Social Security Act (FICA) to the U.S. citizens who are employed by its foreign affiliate. The regulations under this section at 26 CFR 31.3121(l) direct to 26 CFR 36.3121(l)-0. It is here that it states that the “American employer” has made an agreement with the IRS to extend the insurance coverage of Social Security, through FICA, to employees of a foreign subsidiary of the “American employer”. This is the hidden connection between an American and the IRS. The federal government does not have jurisdiction over a free, sovereign American so it cannot write laws that subject an American to any duty. The government has created the “American employer”, which is an employer of Americans, in order to initiate the Social Security fraud.
It is, therefore, necessary for an American to be both a “taxpayer” and a “U.S. citizen” to be eligible to apply for a Social Security number. By applying for a Social Security number, an American has given the federal government prima facie evidence that that person is a “U.S. citizen” and a “taxpayer”. After all, it is said that ignorance of the law is no excuse. The combination of the terms “U.S. citizen” and “taxpayer” is known as a “U.S. resident”. This is defined at title 26 USC Sec. 865(g). A “U.S. citizen”, in other words, a person born in one of the sovereign states who then establishes a residence in a U.S. possession and further acquires U.S. possession citizenship, who now resides in the United States would be a foreigner since the U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries. The next time someone wants to know if you are a “U.S. resident”, just say “no”. (For more information concerning the term “resident”, see the post titled “The U.S. Resident” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3g on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog).
The Internal Revenue Manual declares that “The Criminal Investigation Division enforces the criminal statutes applicable to income, estate, gift, … tax laws … involving United States citizens residing in foreign countries and nonresident aliens subject to federal income tax filing requirements …”. So right here the government is informing everyone of the limited jurisdiction of the CID within the IRS. Since the U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries, the sovereign States are foreign to them.
The income tax was first established within an Act of Congress approved on August 5, 1861, “An Act to provide increased revenue from imports to pay interest on the public debt, and for other purposes”. Sections 49 through 51 established an income tax upon collectors of internal revenue. Section 49 established the income tax and stated that it applied to “the persons hereinafter named”. Section 50 then named assessors and collectors of internal revenue duties, along with other government officials. Section 51 granted the government the right to levy those who were delinquent in their payments of the tax. (For a more in depth examination of the income tax, link to “The Income Tax and the Act of Congress that established it” here at http://wp.me/pCW6e-4A on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog). The Internal Revenue Service always points to the Supreme Court case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916) as their Constitutional right to collect income taxes. Mr. Frank Brushaber was an assessor and collector for foreign investors in the Union Pacific Railroad Company, acting as their fiduciary (agent in trust). He was therefore legally subject to the income tax. This is why the Supreme Court stated that the federal government always had the power to implement income taxes – of course the federal government can implement income taxes on its revenue collectors/assessors. Please note that the Act of Congress that initiated the income tax is based upon revenue from importing.
Part of the definition of “taxpayer” concerns section 511 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936. Within section 511 is the definition of a controlled foreign corporation. This matches with the scenario of an “American employer” that consists of a domestic corporation that has a foreign subsidiary. Within the Internal Revenue Code at 26 USC Sec. 902 is the provision for a domestic corporation to treat income taxes paid by its foreign subsidiary as a dividend. The actual internal revenue code sections that are the basis of an income tax return are more fully evidenced in the link to my court case papers further along in this page.
The definition of “taxpayer” also states that it may include a partnership. A Social Security number is a person’s membership number in the partnership that is the “taxpayer”. The definition of “net earnings from self-employment” at 26 USC Sec. 1402(a) defines such earnings as including the distributive shares from a partnership, whether or not distributed. The regulations under the self-employment statute, 26 USC Sec. 1402, allow for a partnership to be treated as a corporation without affecting the self-employment directive in the statute concerning the distributive share of the partner. This is evidenced at 26 CFR 1.1402(a)-2(g).
Therefore, by applying for a Social Security number one has become a “U.S resident”, a term within the Internal Revenue Code that includes the definitions of the terms “taxpayer” and “U.S. citizen”. A free sovereign American that applies for a Social Security number has unwittingly applied to become an employee of a foreign affiliate of an “American employer” that itself is the “taxpayer” and that holds an undistributed dividend for each of its partners, said dividend being derived from income taxes paid by its foreign subsidiary. This is, therefore, self-employment income attributed to the individual partner who applied for a Social Security number and now, since the dividend is derived from revenue from importing within the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws, subject to the income tax. In other words, the “U.S. Resident” is a federal tax collector of revenue from importing duties within the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws.
Why doesn’t the individual have to list the income from this undistributed dividend? Well, the IRS Form 1040 is actually a foreign tax credit form. The income from the undistributed dividend is offset by a foreign tax credit – FICA. Since the U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries, FICA is a foreign tax.
The government has slowly brainwashed Americans over many generations to believe that an American’s earnings are somehow a federally taxable item. But the income tax only applies to collectors and assessors of internal revenue taxes. So by selecting Frank Brushaber to be the government’s poster boy for the Supreme Court ruling, everyone believed that earning income somehow was now under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Yet other Supreme Court rulings have consistently ruled that the 16th Amendment conferred no new taxing authority to the federal government. The Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 U.S. 103 (1916) Supreme Court decision stated that the “the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation…”. Also the Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 237 U.S. 165 (1918) Supreme Court decision stated that “The Sixteenth Amendment… does not extend the taxing power to new or excepted subjects…”. Since the Supreme Court ruled that the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation, then the revenue being generated from the income tax must be taxable under one of the existing commerce jurisdictions granted to the government by the Constitution. As evidenced within this blog, that jurisdiction is foreign commerce. (For more information concerning the Supreme Court decisions, see the post titled “The Supreme Court decisions concerning the 16th Amendment” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog).
It is obvious that the government never intended that Social Security should be a benevolent insurance program. By hiding the definitions of “taxpayer”, “U.S. citizen”, and “U.S. resident” the government is able to use common, ordinary words to hide their true intentions. When an American hears the word “taxpayer” the meaning is “a payer of taxes”, while the government means a federal employee in the Merchant Marine. Then to use an undistributed dividend to export the necessary income to all the partners within the partnership (the American employer that is the true “taxpayer”) in order to make it legal from the government’s viewpoint to enforce the income tax laws upon all Social Security applicants is truly beyond the scope of any kind of honest credibility. The government’s machinations behind the Social Security scheme are truly malicious and hateful.
I am now involved with the most important federal tax case in history. The government has become the “tax protester” in my case and refuses to obey the law. The courts have actually failed in their most basic duty, that of ruling on the constitutionality of an Act of Congress, specifically the Act of Congress approved on March 3, 1791. (For more information concerning my constitutional challenge to this Act of Congress, see the post titled “The Whiskey Rebellion” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-1b on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog). As such, it has become my duty pursuant to the Declaration of Independence to inform all free sovereign Americans of the Social Security fraud being imposed upon them. The Declaration of Independence states “But when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”. The long convoluted trail to the personal income tax through the Social Security scam certainly qualifies as evincing a design to reduce Americans under absolute despotism. Ever since the Declaration of Independence inked the words “all men are created equal”, the government has been slowly, deliberately, and surreptitiously planning the Social Security fraud.
Here is the link to the latest document that I have filed in my federal tax case: Federal Case #08-273 (WDPA) Defendant’s Reply. Please note that any unsealed document on the court’s docket is public domain. Outside of the Department of Justice and it’s subordinate Federal Judiciary, I don’t believe that anyone else actually knows the underlying law. I have been involved in a federal court case wherein the judge relied upon the representative of the Department of Justice for instructions! Don’t expect your local IRS to understand any of this – IRS employees are just other people who have been brainwashed their entire lives. However, I find the people who work as agents and officers of the IRS don’t even understand the concept of freedom.
The above Defendant’s Reply exhibits the actual statutes and regulations behind Social Security (FICA) and the personal income tax. There is one typo on page 19 of the Defendant’s Reply. The reply mistakenly prefixes the USC title for “Bankruptcy” as 26 when it should be 11. The same is true for the associated CFR, 26 CFR should read as 11 CFR “Federal elections”. This, by the way, is the legal evidence that the federal government is bankrupt; Title 11 USC “Bankruptcy” is implemented by Title 11 CFR “Federal elections”. The international counterfeiters (Federal Reserve System) bankrupted the federal government in 1933 and wrote the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 to collect money from all free Americans by combining the previous internal revenue laws, Social Security, and the Merchant Marine Act of 1936. By applying for a Social Security number an American has given away all sovereignty (freedom from external control) and become a slave for the government, which itself is a bankrupt entity owned by the international counterfeiters. To see more about the bankruptcy and the reasons that Social Security was created, see the Post “The Fed Owns the Gov’t – The Gov’t Controls its Employees – Social Security Makes Americans into Federal Employees” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-5J on the “Posts for Freedom” page of this Blog.
All IRS indictments hide the actual charge by simply labeling the defendant (victim) as a “resident”, referring to the term “resident” as defined at 26 USC Sec. 865(g), which includes the definitions of the terms “taxpayer” and “U.S. citizen” along with the implied reference to importing (the cite to 26 USC Section 911). Once this understanding reaches the general population, there can be no convictions of any American for personal income tax crimes. (For an in depth examination of the actual charge of willful failure see the post titled “Title 26 USC Sec. 7203, Willful failure to file” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-1y on the “Posts for freedom” page of this Blog).
I will be Blogging more about my case as the days go forward. The Congress has reconvened and it is time that we free, sovereign Americans start to pay attention to what is going on in Washington, D.C. And we should not simply pay attention to what is going on there, we should be directing it! We Americans are the sovereigns and the government is made up of public servants. The only way that the government can claim sovereign immunity is based upon Americans applying for Social Security numbers and, thus, declaring themselves to be “U.S. residents”. This is why the government claims that the income tax is voluntary – each of us voluntarily applied for a Social Security number (although nowadays it is the custom to register an American’s children at an early age to qualify for exemptions). The very first law that established Social Security for state employees uses the term “voluntary” – title 42 USC Section 418, “Voluntary agreements for coverage of State and local employees”. In the eyes of the federal government any American who has applied for a Social Security number has waived all sovereignty and has volunteered to be subject to the personal income tax and, thus, no better off than the serfs of old England.
The internal revenue laws have been intentionally misconstrued in order to bring about the plethora of federal alphabet agencies that are now regulating all “U.S. Residents”. To see more concerning the aggrandizement of the government’s powers go to the Post titled “The Medicine and Drug Laws are Internal Revenue Laws” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-4M on this Blog.
One further item should be noted. The personal income tax upon free, sovereign Americans is based upon the Social Security fraud. However, the corporate income tax is probably legal since a corporation is a government creation and if the government wishes to consider a corporation as a “U.S. resident”, which it does in the definition at 26 USC Sec. 865(g), then that is fine. Any true foreigner may be subject to an income tax if the government so desires. But the government’s Social Security fraud upon free, sovereign Americans to subject them to an income tax is patently malevolent and purely evil. Income tax is the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. Inheritance tax is the third plank of the Communist Manifesto. Having the government controlling education is the tenth plank of the Communist Manifesto. It was in high school that I was told that I had to have a Social Security number.
The ultimate conclusion behind the Social Security scam is that the federal government is fully aware that all Americans are free, sovereign individuals because the Declaration of Independence is the organic and fundamental first law of the land and it states that “all men are created equal”. We Americans can simply reclaim our status and abolish the concept of Social Security as a federal insurance program since it only applies to “U.S. residents”.
If you have downloaded my court document from this Page of this Blog then you have seen some of what exactly F.I.C.A. is in reality. For an in depth examination of F.I.C.A. go to http://wp.me/pCW6e-5i – it’s a railroad tax that is applicable to seamen!
I have written a Post that incorporates all of the information from this Page in “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-6N – the liability for filing income tax returns is exposed by the actual statutes and regulations.
THERE IS MUCH MORE FOR ALL AMERICANS TO LEARN!!
THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS BEING PAID FOR BY “TAXPAYERS”!
NOTICE TO ANYONE WHO HAS ORDERED MY CD TITLED “THE UNITED STATES DOESN’T OWN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER” – PLEASE GO TO THIS LINK FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION – http://wp.me/pCW6e-6B – THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT !
There is a movie available on Google titled “The Money Changers – How the International Bankers Gained Control of America” that will reinforce everything that has been written on this Page. It is approximately 3 1/2 hours long, but well worth the view.
To see what’s behind the scenes, go to “The Bankers’ Blueprint to Destroy American Sovereignty” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-7h .
I have written a memorandum titled “The United States Doesn’t Own the Mississippi River” which exposes the entire history of the New World. What Americans have been taught is a fairy tale. It starts with the Post of the same name on this Blog, but goes much, much further. I have cited the actual statutes, regulations, and other official documents of the United States. What you will read will educate you and, at the same time, anger you.
You will learn that the Civil War was preplanned long ago. You will understand what the “Union” actually means. Find out why Social Security is headquartered in Baltimore while all other federal headquarters are in Washington, D.C. See for yourself that the “taxpayer” paid for 9/11. Nearly everything that has happened during America’s history was preplanned long ago.
Here’s the order form:
Order Form
================================================
Llstuler's Blog 
84 Comments
An astute discerner should read the Creature from Jekyl Island and he/she will discover all that needs to be known with regard to how the destruction of the Republic was planned, coordinated and implemented. The socialist/communist/liberal mindset infiltrated the Republic in the late 1800’s and became powerful before the media, at that time, could try to stop the takeover.
The Republic is dead, the demokory is now in power and the subjugation of the masses is being fully mechanized. I am somewhat happy that I am 80 and may not see the complete enforcement of the takeover! May the Creator love and bless us when it does finally occur!
It is a knowen fact that all new borns get a SS number before they leave the hospital by law. So in fact all new borns are forced to get a SS number.
Actually, the government has now stated that the only way that a parent may claim a child as a dependent is to get that child a S.S. #.
I have had several people tell me that they have refused to do so.
FWIW Arnold, I have 3 sons, none are enumerated. There is no law that can compel someone born in one of the 50 States to apply for an SSN. True it may be difficult to live without one, but there is no law requiring you to apply. Think about it this way, if it was mandatory to get one at birth why wouldn’t it just be assigned? Instead you as the parent must request it.
Thanks for posting well done Listula! Hey patriot there is still hope fella! no worries! tyrants come and go the people will prevail. Happy 81st too 😀
Here is a news story about me and the income tax being connected to the SS#
Except for one small detail: I never signed up for SS, my Mother signed me up. Under contractual law, all parties must be apprised of the terms of the contract and in this case, no terms of the contract were made known to me and are still unknown. Basically, under intense scrutiny, the SS contracts wouldn’t hold up and would be declared null and void. But, try and find an attorney who will take this case. Good luck.
I am deeply honored to found your blog on Whatreallyhappened.com I have linked your blog to the sovereignty Intelligence service website
Here is a link to an article by an outfit called Team Law, from a while back:
Click to access explanation_of_ssa_trust.pdf
Near the end, they claim to eliminate these taxes by “creating a proper indenture”, but they don’t mention in the article how to go about this. If you go to their web site, they state that they don’t read e-mails (you have to register with their blog to even post them) unless they are pursuant to a phone conversation. They don’t even list their phone no. on their web site!
If anybody can figure out how to create one of these indentures, you would probably be doing the country’s citizens a huge service by posting how to go about it.
Behind-the-throner Edward Mandell House said this to Woodrow Wilson:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
Here’s the problem.. If you don’t pay up the unjust judge, the brainwashed jury and the IRS thugs are going to ignore the constitution and throw you into a jail cell regardless of what’s legal or not. It’s still good that you’re sharing this information though. What’s the solution?
I am one that does not pay up to the internal ripoff service. I have been threatened in many ways by the IRS but nothing has ever occurred since I learned what the law is all about. The IRS and the rest of the scum bags of the Treasury have conspired together to enforce a non-lawful levy on my retirement social security. Most folks don’t know that a federal statute requires a regulation for force and effect of law. The lien and levy process of Title 26 gets authority from Title 27 CFR Part 70 for unpaid ATF taxes of subtitle E, Title 26. This means that the IRS is acting under color of law when enforcing the levy or lien of Title 26 for alleged unpaid income taxes of subtitle A, Title 26. Acting under color of law is a crime. However, the Federal Government is corrupt so it looks the other way when citizens of the private sector are tried in federal court of which they have absolutely no business of ever being there, because statutory law prevails. Irwin Schiff is a good example of a private citizen who ended up in federal court only to be tried as a criminal for crimes that do not exist in the IRC. I’m sure by now that Mr.Schiff wished he had never accepted a federal indictment for a federal crime in which he was never within federal jurisdiction. Knowledge is power. Use it or continue to be a slave to tyranny.
A.Jenkins,
You’re correct that all the liabilities for the IRS are based upon ATF regulations. That’s because the law that created the income tax states that it applies to collectors of “internl duties” (ATF taxes). When you applied for a S.S.# you joined the Merchant Marine (definition of “taxpayer”). You are attributed an undistributed dividend that is based upon the collection of income taxes as a “U.S. shareholder”, which conveys the liability to file income taxes. Yes, it’s all based on undisclosed contract requirements. But everything that the gov’t does is done to the letter of the law under foreign commerce. See my Post “The Bankers’ Blueprint to Destroy American Sovereignty” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-7h for more (this Post is not mentioned in The Social Security Scam). Also read my Post “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code” at http://wp.me/pCW6e-6N which exposes the underlying ATF regulations.
We have a similar scam in Canada.
Is the income tax voluntary?
Are you working in your own capacity for your own benefit? if yes then it’s voluntary.
OR
Are you working in the capacity of a legal Representative of a federally created artificial person, for it’s benefit ? If yes then it’s not voluntary because you are receiving a benefit.
Canadian Law Dictionary 5th edition pg 134
Individual- A person. Under the bill of rights RSC 1985 c44 , “the right of the individual” extends to natural persons only, and not to corporations RV Colgate – Palmolive ltd (1972)
Why is it within the income tax act your refereed to as an Officer, taxpayer, person, Client etc?
Here is some more interesting info.
Freedom of Contract Canadian Law Dictionary 5th ed pg 115
The ability of parties to agree to the most advantageous bargain between them without interference from the courts. In the eighteenth century there was little restriction placed on this freedom, the philosophy being that men could pursue their interests in the way they saw fit and that the duty of the law was merely to give effect to the intentions of the parties. This position still finds expression today.
So .. we have a powerful right to structure our life and our work relationships the way that we want.
Privity of Contract Canadian law dictionary 5th ed Page 220
The doctrine where by one can enforce contractual rights against another only if one was party to the contract. Under the general doctrine of privity of contract, no one who is not an original party to a contract is entitled to seek to enforce the terms of the contract or is bound by any of it provisions.
Summary:
Canada Customs an Revenue Agency c17 act 1999
1) The powers duties and functions of the Minister extend to and include All matters over which Parliament has jurisdiction(parliament has jurisdiction over indirect taxes not direct taxes) , not by law assigned to any department, board or agency of the Government of Canada other than the agency, relating to
A) Duties of customs and matters incident thereto
B) Duties of Excise
C) Stamp duties and the preparation and issue of stamps and stamped paper.
d)INTERNAL TAXES, unless otherwise provided , including income taxes and
E) such other subjects as may be assigned to the Minister by Parliament or the Governor in Council
So we see Parliament has jurisdiction over indirect taxes, they go on to call income tax an INTERNAL FEDERAL TAX within the Parliaments jurisdiction. So somehow within this box is the only place income tax exists.
Income tax is not an internal tax at all it’s a direct tax and the Parliament has no jurisdiction here. more games with in the statute to enslave.
Is the income tax a fraud? It appears not.
“Juries ignorant est cum jus nostrum ignoramus ” – translation -It is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights.
Is Income tax unconstitutional ? Appears, No
Income tax is a federal INTERNAL tax making it an indirect tax, which is only applicable to a federal created artificial person know as an “OFFICER”
Was Income tax supposed to be temporary? No…..
Committee of the Whole July Th 1917 Sir Thomas White Min of Finance
” I have placed no time limit upon this measure but merely have placed upon hansard the suggestion that a year or two after the war is over , the measure should be REVIEWED by the minister of finance of the day, with a view of judging whether it is suitable to the conditions which prevail”
Is Income Tax Illegal ? No….
The original Income War tax act has the required enacting clause. Today’s version is just an amended version of the original. The biggest difference being the original was only 39 pages in length LOL
Will you will be stripped of all benefits the system offers? Lets see…
A natural person has the right to contract because , upon our birth we are endowed with the gift of freewill, and the natural right to self determination. This natural right can be exercised with or without knowledge to enter into legally binding contracts, the responsibility and choice is yours.
Canadian Law dictionary Th ed pg 163
Contract- A contract is a legally recognized agreement between two or more persons, giving rise to obligations that may be enforced in the courts. By such agreements the parties not only restrict their present or future freedom to act , by the limitations imposed upon themselves by the agreement , they are creating a set of legal rules , binding as regards to themselves and only themselves
So .. the power you have is you can literally take control and deal under these private contracts., but if your unaware of your power you’ll fall into the default benefit systems the Government has created.
Default Contract of service
Relationship = Government servant (like Ronald Reagan once said” The taxpayer – that’s someone who works for the federal government but doesn’t have to take the civil service examination”)
ID required = Social insurance number
Payment = Taxable renumeration
Mandatory Benefit
Canadian pension plan = Officer
Employment insurance = Insured Person
Workers Compensation = Worker
You are one of two things,
Slaves living in the Illusion of freedom
OR
Free living in an Illusion of slavery
Some ways to exercise your rights – THE COMMON OPTION
– If you want you can voluntarily represent the taxpayer.
-Work for the taxpayer for the benefits of CPP (although there are many private pension plans that perform better).
-File an Income Tax Return for the taxpayer you represent.
-Learn the limited rights of the taxpayer.
-Obey every law applicable to the taxpayer.
-Just remember the taxpayer is an artificial person.
-It can’t be hurt and has no feelings
-It’s creator leaves it with only enough to survive.
-It’s creator is more concerned about it’s OWN survival
REMEMBER Your human rights don’t apply to the taxpayer
The Forgotten Option
-To earn a living to sustain your life
-Exercises your “liberty” and present yourself as a natural person.
-Exchange your physical and intellectual “property” for compensation.
-Only choose benefits you are willing to pay the price for.
-Don’t remain disadvantaged and let others choose for you.
-Become personally responsible and learn to exercise your rights.
-Never again let deception of man destroy your gift of freedom
Learn to live with respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law, so you can become healthy wealthy and wise.
NEVER EVER EVER present yourself as ANY TYPE OF PERSON, natural or otherwise, UNLESS WHEN DOING SO YOU SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDE ALL STATUTORY DEFINITIONS OF ALL TYPES OF “PERSONS”.
A man is NOT a “natural person”! EVER!
I continue to see people making the mistake of referring to themselves as “natural persons”. “Natural persons” come into existence by presumption. They are a legal fiction, created usually by “government”, for the purpose of controlling men.
If you understand trust law well enough to claim your person, then you can present your self-governed, international, commercial, legal person in a legal setting, but when you do, you must take care to restrict it.
Dean Clifford’s videos at freemanitoba.com provide very useful instruction on how to use your legal person.
For example, I live on the land of Georgia, a nation-state on North America. The corporation known as “STATE OF GEORGIA” has a code that defines ALL persons as “a corporation”. It is set forth at Official Code of Georgia Section 1-3-3 (14).
So if I want to use my person to make a claim for redress of an injury in a STATE OF GEORGIA court, it would be wise to state the following:
“Comes now JOHN QUINCY DOE (type exactly as spelled on the birth certificate), the self-governed international commercial legal person of the man called John Quincy, and on this public court record complains of __________. JOHN QUINCY DOE is not and does not consent to be a “person” within the meaning of Official Code of Georgia Section 1-3-3 (14), or a “person” within the meaning of any other statutory code definition.”
And you would sign this pleading as follows:
By executor: John Quincy (autographed or hand printed – I would probably go with hand printed in blue ink and affix a seal.) Leave off the family name as you inherited that name; it is not the name by which you were called by your parents. If you have chosen to be known by a new name, then you use that.
Oh, and don’t exchange your labor for COMPENSATION, either! “Compensation” is a defined legal term in the tax code, and it refers a type of “Gross Receipt”, which means it was derived from “trade or business, which is defined as “the performance of the functions of a public office [of the United States].”
Exchange your labor for lawful money! (Even though there technically isn’t any. If you received FRN’s for your labor, you are converting them to lawful money by decree, because you are a man and you have dominion over the earth.)
What about the unemployed? The homeless? Do they have to pay income taxes? Are they eligible for social security? I guess if you are homeless to the IRS you are actually a self employed tax dodger. If you have never held a job how do you support yourself? None of their damn business. The fifth amendment protects all US citizens from self in-crimination. Let the Federal Gov’t find the income.
As long as no laws are broken who cares?
I don’ t believe there is any protection for “U.S. citizens”. That is the name of the corporate franchise created by the 14th Amendment. I certainly do not consent to be known as a “U.S. citizen”, because such creatures of law are owned by the United States. That’s why I’m not registered to vote. Voting is not an unalienable right. Exercising dominion over the earth IS an unalienable right.
The fifth article of the Bill of Rights protects the unalienable right of a man to abstain from compelled self-incrimination. Assert it as a term of trust created for your benefit, for which the United States is a trustee. Then when they attempt to deprive you of that right, the United States is in breach of trust.
Just this past week I came across some credible information to support the claim that the Bill of Rights does not apply to the common man. I therefore retract, at least in part, what I wrote. I base my retraction on an article written by The Informer, which I found to be competently supported by evidence. You can read it here:
Click to access The%20Bill%20of%20Rights%20Fraud%20Part%20I.pdf
and here:
Click to access The%20Bill%20of%20Rights%20Fraud%202.pdf
So do not claim that the Bill of Rights gives you anything. Simply claim the right against self-incrimination to be an unalienable right granted to you by your Creator (or God, if you wish). If you’re an atheist, you’ll have to come up with some other source for your unalienable rights.
The IRS was created through the Social Security Act August 14,1935 Title Vlll. Note the new Health Care Bill is run through Health and Human Services in Baltimore, Maryland not Washington D.C. as is the Social Security charitable trust. The people have contracted, with their signature, into a foreign jurisdiction outside of the protection of the Constitution. It is the people that have walked away from the Constitution, unknowingly, of course. That’s why we can’t bring the Constitution into the courtroom. 14th amendment US (c)itizen debt slaves will NEVER win on issues of law in the courts as long as they’re in the SS trust. Social security is VOLUNTARY AND SO IS paying IRS taxes, but the gift in trust has to be revoked. We have the power to remove ourselves from this jurisdiction along with the debt/credit of the banks and destroy the New World Order, but people don’t want to give up their benefits that they’ll never see anyway. How crazy is that? These taxes have financed the welfare-warfare state. See how Bismarck was able to finance pre-world wars Germany. For the rest of the story see http://www.truthinlaw.net. It is not a casual read but an in-depth study. There is absolutely NO website out there like it. wj
A very nice tease! I noticed that Citizen is capitalized before the 14th amendment in the constitution when I was quite young. I personally tend to refer to SS as the grand ponzi scheme.
Untangling is however far more difficult to think about. My deed of trust is written to my corporate name. My wife wouldn’t here of not reg the kids because of the deductions….Life’s funny – my big hope is that I get on the jury;)
My parents got a SS number for me when I was young. Does that mean the SS number is not legally binding since I was not party to that transaction?
Also, given that there is an SS number associated with me, how do I go about resigning from the Merchant Marine and from the Social Security system?
What we need here is some practical advice to counteract the position we find ourselves in.
Thanks,
MercedMarie
You could have revoked the gift in trust when you were 18 and obviously you didn’t.
The US MERCHANT MARINES is listed on Dun and Bradstreet as a company. Google D&B and find the listing for yourself. You are a 14th amendment (c)itizen and SS Trust under their private law which is why you can’t leave the MERCHANT MARINES. You have only the privileges and immunities that you’re granted not the original jurisdiction and Bill of Rights you thought you had…it is not an easy process for a very good reason…IT’S VOLUNTARY. There is a right way to do it…there needs to be a disclaimer with it. If people knew they could withdraw it would collapse the system, otherwise if the people don’t do something about it we will be stuck in the matrix of the NWO and Agenda 21. We will own nothing, not even our bodies, but we agreed by our silence. If only 3% of the population would do what needs to be done it would totally disrupt their scheme. There is a right way to do this. We have a choice. The remedy is in the law. befree
By the way when you remove yourselt from the SS trust you are not “subject to” any of their private codes, rules, regulations and their adhesion contracts including licensing, fees, taxes, property taxes, etc. All unilateral contracts…mortgages can be flushed. Keep the bankers out of our lives! No checking or savings accounts. There are ways to use the banking system to your advantage with disclaimers. befree
You say ‘there are ways to use the banking sytem’ and ‘THere is a right way to do this’. COuld you be more specific? We need a cook book approach to help us take the steps to become free.
Rescission of the application for a SSN on Form SS-5 can be made at any time for fraud. You are not confined to some brief period following your 18th birthday.
There is an SSA form, SSA-521, that can be used, but notice to SSA headquarters via notarial presentment with a follow-up certificate of non-response is advised.
Opinions differ as to what is required for effectiveness. IMO, these three steps are all that is required to prove that YOU no longer have a SSN to use. This does not get rid of the SSN, but when you can honestly say that you don’t have it, it’s hard for the guvmint to prove you are benefiting from the number.
Step 1. Complete IN BLUE INK Form SSA-521.
a. In the NAME box, strike thru all but ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL. Print the SSN name as it appears on the card.
b. Write in the SSN number in the box.
c. Print your birth certificate name in the PRINT YOUR NAME box, but strike thru the word “initial” and print your full b.c. name, first, middle, and last. For example, JOHN QUINCY DOE.
d. DATE OF APPLICATION, get as close as you can to the original.
e. TYPE OF APPLICATION, write “Form SS-5”.
f. TYPE OF BENEFIT, write “Social Security Card”.
g. Give reason for withdrawal: If your parents signed you up, something along these lines would work:
“My parents applied for a Social Security Card on my behalf when I was a minor. I am now of age, and have determined that their application has resulted in a disadvantage to me. I further assert that their application is void due to fraudulent non-disclosure by the Social Security Administration. The original application is hereby declared rescinded.
If you want to use the “Continued on Reverse” option, you could add:
“I am not a citizen of the United States. I have no allegiance to the United States. I refuse all public benefits offered by the United States.”
h. Strike thru the word “person” in “SIGNATURE OF PERSON MAKING REQUEST” and insert the word “man”.
i. Under signature, strike through “first name, middle initial, last name”, and just print the words “By grantor:” followed by printing your given name without your family name. For example “By grantor: John Quincy”. Print the phrase “Without recourse.” above the given name.
Don’t use a zip code in the Mailing Address. Write out the state name. Leave county name blank. That is a corporate county entity and people don’t live in corporations. To make doubly sure I am not in U.S. jurisdiction, I write out street numbers and use no abbreviations, and I make delivery in the care of a non-domestic agent (Me!).
Example: 100 LIBERTY DR SE LIBERTY GA 30000, the U.S. military residence address, becomes:
C/o non-domestic agent near:
One Hundred Liberty Drive Southeast
near: Liberty
Georgia
Make a scan or photocopy of both sides of the card before you surrender it. When you go to the local SSA office, give them the two originals along with the card. Ask them to stamp and date one of the originals as evidence that you brought the form in, and return it to you They can place the stamp down in the witness signature area. Insist on getting a stamped, dated original back.
Do not expect a response such as “approved” or “disapproved”. They cannot contest your rescission. Their acquiescence is demonstrated when they have been silent for thirty days.
Step 2. Send a notice to SSA HQ of your rescission and your revoke of the grant of license to create and maintain all accounts associated with the old SSN. Give them thirty days for them to contest your right to revoke what was granted. Write that no response means they agree to remove all records pertaining to that account number. They will not remove them, but I doubt they will answer either, as a grantor has the absolute right to withdraw what he granted. What was granted was a license to create the account. Send this notice through a notary via notarial presentment. Ask the notary for a certified copy of the presentment.
Step 3. After 30 days elapse with no answer, ask the notary for a certified copy of the certificate of non-response.
Keep all your originals or certified copies in a safe place. You can make certified copies of originals in your custody.
If you are ever “arrested”, i.e. kidnapped by “law enforcement”, they will badger you for that number, because without it , their own records will reflect that they f***ed up big time by capturing a man not subject to their jurisdiction. You have to refuse bail, too. Just tell them you don’t have a SSN. They’ll tell you “You cannot be processed without it.” That means they cannot get paid by the United States for kidnapping you without it. Tell them that’s their problem, not yours, and that you demand to speak with your attorney, the Attorney General for The State of _____ (to report the felony perpetrated against you). Hold fast and DO NOT provide that number. You CANNOT use it again without being guilty of a crime.
Would you mind showing a statute that states that anyone who accepts a SSN is liable for the income tax?
I ran this by an acquaintance who is a Constitutional attorney and an expert on the tax law and he does not believe that there is such a statute. But, if you can post it here, I can run it by him.
Thanks!
I’m tired of ‘experts’ that think they know everything. Where did he go to school? These ‘experts’ never seem to solve anything.
Go to http://www.truthinlaw.net it is listed on ‘Dose of Reality’ Social Security Act Title Vlll….it is part of the Act setting up how SS will be financed. See the link to Bismarck and Germany’s SS and how it financed the welfare-warfare system….this thru the IRS and our contribution to FICA and is financing all these wars….it is the people that must stop this insanity…look into the mirror…the problem is YOU! Quit financing this welfare-warfare state and all this insanity will stop and…. befree
can you send me more information on all this stuff thank you
I have a CD with the real history of the New World for sale for $40.00. Please send by courier such as UPS, FedEx, DHL, etc. to Larry Stuler, 565 Addison Street, Washington, Pennsylvania 15301.
I’m resisting the urge to be harsh, but your question belies the present location of your head as being in a warm, damp, dark, stinky place.
There is no statute that governs perfectly legal private contracts such as the SSN agreement. The United States is specifically prohibited my making laws that impede the performance of contracts, including contracts between foreigners (Americans) and the United States. The contract is still enforceable by the courts though.
Technically, you could hold that number and never use it (i.e. provide it), and probably never incur liability as a “taxpayer”. But attach it to an interest bearing bank account, and the IRS will be all over you claiming that all that you deposited in that account is “income”, i.e. the remuneration obtained from the exercise of a federally connected privileged activity. AND THAT IS ALL THAT “INCOME” IS! So never admit you received “income”. Even if its true, don’t admit it, but if it is true, don’t deny it, either.
Larry;
My compliments. You have done an excellent job of explaining what I have found in my research. It is time for people to climb out of the Matrix. Thank you for telling the folks.
Paul
Please add me to your email. Thank you!
The following are quotes from Congressional records of 1935 when discussing passing the(FICA)Bill. They knew then that forcing the public to pay for a supposed retirement insurance was a scam.
“Why, bless your life, you are going to build up a fund that by 1970 will have a surplus of $33,000,000,000. This is thirty-three thousand million dollars which will be in the hands of the Secretary of the Treasury and is more money than there is in the world. And you are going to raise this by compulsion. Regardless of its unconstitutionality…The Government, by virtue of the passage of this act, will have wrung out of the poor people of this coming generation the greatest surplus ever contemplated by the brain of any business man.” …. This is compulsion of the rankest kind. Do not be misled by the title. The title says “Old-Age Benefits.” Shame on you for putting such a misleading and unfair label on such a nefarious bill. ….. What Is the hurry about crowding an unconstitutional proposition like this through the House today? I cannot see It. I repeat., I cannot see it. And I do not believe that Franklin D. Roosevelt himself ever put his stamp of approval on this proposition. (Congressional Record-House, April 18,1935, page 5993, Congressman Jenkins of Ohio)
“The best legal talent the administration has been able to engage from the departments and elsewhere has endeavored to so frame title II, change its title, distort it, and put the tax feature in title VIII, to mislead and deceive, if possible, the Supreme Court of the United States. I stated yesterday, and I state again today, that the members of the committee in their conscience know that title II and title VIII are unconstitutional. They know they are trying to set up as a Federal activity a police power that is reserved to the States…
…for, as I have said, you are not giving these benefits to the needy at all- but you are saying to the wage earner, “We are going to force you to pay a tax to buy an annuity from the Government.” (Congressional Record-House, April 18, 1935, page 5991, Congressman Reed of New York)
“…I do not believe that any lawyer of experience would assert that the bill is free from constitutional question. I do not wish to expand the constitutional argument, because the Senate is not in a receptive mood, but the bill undertakes to impose a tax upon specific employers….
…But if the court looks through mere form to the substance of this bill, I assert again that the question of the validity of the bill is one which no responsible lawyer would undertake to say is not in serious question” (Congressional Record-Senate Volume 79, June 18, 1935, page 9514, Senator George)
“No, I am talking about the bill. Everyone doubts the constitutionality of the bill. Even proponents of the bill doubt it. I dare say to them that they not only have a right to doubt it but I do not believe it is possible for the bill as it is now written to be held constitutional. I would bet everything I have on it. I do not mean that it will be held unconstitutional by a divided court either.” (Congressional Record-Senate Volume 79, June 18, 1935, page 9531, Senator Long)
I haven’t done the research on the SS aspect, but it aligns with a lot of the research that I have done on the IRS, TD and various other government issues on taxes. There is an exit though, the William Lear case, which revolves around the Paperwork Reduction Act and the governments bootleg 1040 forms, and the Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule (9b). Fundamentally the government says a lot of things it can’t prove in the actual statutes. Fact is in 2006 the 2nd district took a lot of the bite out of their bark, of course it doesn’t do you any good if you’re unaware. Unfortunately they have an overwhelming intimidation factor and aren’t the least bit afraid to use it, and therein lies a goodly part of the problem. Statically it breaks down to 30% of the general population are illiterate in this area, 30% are cowards and the rest just don’t give a damn, so education in this arena is an absolute uphill climb. Anymore would be to long a discussion for a comment but I can be contacted at blehr@argontech.net. Keep up the good work.
I found your research very interesting and wish to learn more about what you have posted. Liberty Blessings, Dona
Great post!
Sad part is that even if you could get an entire “60 minutes” episode to explain all of this you might reach 30% of the population. Of those 30%, 3% might understand and agree with you, 10% would never comprehend what you have said, and the majority would think that you found a loophole for people to not “pay their fair share” of taxes and they would clamor for our politicians to close this “unjust” loophole immediately! Those who wish to be ignorant and free, wish for what has never been and never will be, and the majority of Americans can not think for themselves. Now, IF you could prove this and win in a court others would follow and it could get out like that, the problem is the “powers that be” will not “play fair” in a court and will screw over anyone that tries to assert anything you have laid out here. Please tell me how the above does not render you’re diligent and commendable uncovering of the truth null and void! Do you plan to be a sacrificial lamb and try to present your case to the courts in pursuit of “justice”? Might you consider joining forces with other groups such as “We the people”? Thanks for all you have shared.
Right you are.
The constitution has been under attack from its inception and we have always been in a struggle between those that obey and protect the Constitution and those that are not content to allow others their inalienable rights and freedoms.
Usually the balance favored the Constitution until 1913 and the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Our founding fathers warned us about central banks and a host of other encroachments on our inalienables, but we didn’t listen and now are reaping the debt slavery that the banisters and our complicit elected criminals have created for us.
Since the average American has been mind numbed with government controlled education and has been carefully screened from pertinent history by our controlled media, he is ignorant to the debt slavery planned for him as he indulges in the entertainment trap of TV and the myriad of distractions.
That appears to be coming to an end as more and more are seeing the obvious breakdown occurring and are once again taking focused interest in finding what’s wrong.
Many are finding the Constitution and realizing that is their only protection of their inalienable rights and freedoms, only as long as our electeed and appointed representatives honor their oath to obey and protect the Constitution.
The purge that is coming will hopefully get us back to a majority of oath honoring representatives who will end the Federal Reserve and bring about a sound money policy and an end of debt slavery.
Once we return to a policy of free enterprise unfettered by government whim and infinite spending habits we can lead by example instead of force and imperialistic maneuvers that just ticks off the rest of the world.
If this does not happen, the world will likely fall into massive dark ages as the UN pushes its policy to eradicate 90% of the world’s population.
You know, if you want to be taken seriously outside your little echo chamber here, a great start would be by trying to avoid glaring errors of fact such as stating that the Declaration of Independence is a law.
But judging by your post and its comments, I have a feeling that’s really not among your goals. Carry on!
Aaron,
The United States Code lists the organic laws of the land in the following order: (1) The Declaration of Independence; (2) The Articles of Confederation; (3) The Northwest Ordinance; and (4) the Constitution. Nothing on my Blog is anything other than the actual laws, statutes, regulations, etc. I make no assumptions or interpretations. You can verify this at any law library. – Larry
You know better than the Supreme Court, gotcha. ‘Bye now.
Aaron,
This is in reply to your previous comment concerning the Supreme Court. Apparently you have not read my Blog at all since I agree wholeheartedly with all the Supreme Court decisions which you would have known if you bothered to read it. Go to http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a (Supreme Court decisions) and actually learn something. – Larry
Larry! The Blog…is GREATTTT!!!!!! fight the “good fight” as you always have…You are doing your followers a true service…At least all the hard (Research) you did can be put to use by others…Let’s link our Blog sites…they do compliment one another…we will talk soon!
Ron
I filed a Form SSA-521 with a local Social Security office, in which I withdrew the Form SS-5 application for benefit. At that time I also returned the SS card to a worker at that office. I asked her for a signed photocopy of the form, as evidence that SSA had received it, and she brought me back a signed copy, which I have in my files. She also told me that she shredded the card. Is there anything else I should do to ensure that all parties understand that my application on Form SS-5 has been rescinded? I have not used the number at all since filing this form.
There are a lot of products available at “Sovereigntyfilings.com” that concern how to restore your sovereignty.
Hello we corresponded about a year ago…are you familiar w/
← The Lawsuit – USA vs Me
The Case of the Hornswoggled Peon…
have a look
http://usofavus.com/wp/
Thanks for your link. Please keep me posted on your progress.
I just added this site to my google reader, great stuff. Can’t get enough!
Loving the info on this web site , you have done great job on the content . cpanel vps | cheap vps |
i m very much inspired you. thanks
What is really funny is that they shot their selves in the foot by helping banks and big business. Big business has been paying very little income tax. The lower class has been put out of work by outsourcing, so they have no money to pay taxes. So the only group that was paying taxes was the middle class. Now they have pretty much wiped out the middle class, and wonder why they don’t have enough money for things such as social security. I had to laugh when John McCain said that social security was a ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff proud. But in truth I have had many debates with people supporting security, and in the end they just back off, because they have no proof that it isn’t a ponzi scheme. Basically a ponzi scheme is a business that makes money from false pretenses, and the investors lose money, whether that was organization’s intent or not. Many people went to jail even though they made no money for themselves, just because the money was not spent they way that they promised. Social security was set up as an insurance program, for retirement etc. But in the 80s congress said that there was too much money in the social security program, so they started taking money from the program for their own pet projects. This definitely falls in line with the definition of a ponzi scheme. So now when people need their money they get a reduced amount, which eventually will be none. Also, if a person owes IRS or many other divisions of the government any money, they will take a cut from your social security payments. Also, if you stop needing the money and tell the social security department to give it to those who need it, you can not stop them from sending the money to you, unless you pay them back all that they have ever sent you plus interest. It is really amazing the ignorance to these and many other criminal acts by the social security program and the IRS. If the government was ever required to function like a real business, and charge for what they do, instead of using threats and extortion to get money, actions like these and many others would stop. But we are no longer a democracy, so this will never happen. It is obvious where we are heading, and I have been saying that for years. Prepare yourself to be more like countries such as Mexico, the Philippines etc.. with open corruption everywhere, and a society of only rich and poor slaves.
Joe,
I appreciate your comment about attaching it (SSN) to an interest-bearing account. I have filled out Form SSA-521, but I have not turned it in yet.
The problem is, I already have an interest-bearing account with that number attached to it. Also a life insurance policy, and they both report interest (1099-INT). The SSN is also on my passport, which does not expire until 2016 or 2018. Does that mean that I have to open a new bank account? And apply for a new passport? I suppose that I could simply not use the passport for identification, but I plan to travel this year.
Thanks in advance!
Look for a pdf file out on the web called The Errant Sovereign’s Handbook. It contains an example of a letter to terminate the power of attorney inherent in Form SS-5. Revoking the POA may be the best you can hope to do right now. It’s still a big step in the right direction.
Here’s one for you: When buying a firearm at any FFL dealer, in other words, any store that sells firearms, one is asked on the paperwork if one is a US Citizen. Answer no and the dealer will not sell you a gun. Try to explain to the dealer that the FFl is simply a way to trick him into the world of foreign commerce and he will reply “it’s federal law!” and you will go home empty handed. How to explain to these guys that by obtaining an FFL they have inadvertently given up their 2nd Amendment rights by joining the matrix?
Education is the answer and it must come from us. My Post “The Banker’s Blueprint to Destroy American Sovereignty” (http://wp.me/pCW6e-7h) evidences how England’s bankers (the world headquarters of the international counterfeiters is in London, known as “The Crown”) immediately set out to take over the U.S. government by fraud through the foreign commerce clause.
The Social Security Act is in Title 42 of the US Code, and that title has never been enacted into positive law. That means that nobody is required to pay Social Security taxes.
The SS Administration states that your basic benefits are calculated through a formula that uses your lifetime earnings over the 35 years you earned the most. What you paid into the system through withholding taxes has NOTHING to do with it. So why would anybody pay a cent into the system, when you can collect benefits without having to cough up a cent? Don’t take my word for it. Check out Title 42 and the SSA web site.
EVERYBODY working in the 50 states, and legally domiciled in them, should go to their payroll department and demand, in writing, that all such withholding must immediately cease, or they can be charged with embezzlement and breach of fiduciary contract, just for starters. No law requires any private sector company to act as unpaid tax collectors for government at any level, and no private sector worker can be required to have one cent of their pay withheld without their express written consent.
This excellent website really has all the info I needed concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.
Wonderful work! That is the kind of info that are
supposed to be shared across the web. Disgrace on
Google for now not positioning this put up upper!
Come on over and talk over with my site . Thanks =)
A fascinating discussion is definitely worth
comment. I believe that you need to publish more on this subject matter, it may not
be a taboo matter but typically folks don’t discuss such subjects. To the next! All the best!!
Salut, dein Artikel oben ist ehrlich nett.
Normalerweise lese ich nicht bis zum Ende, allerdigs war das wirklich mal
ein kritischer Artikel. Spannend! Bin aber nur durch Zufall über Yahoo auf
deinen Blog aufmerksam geworden. Back to topic: existiert hierzu in der Zwischenzeit etwas Neues?
Habe auf in den Archiven gesucht, aber leider nichts finden können.
Danke im Voraus und weiter so!
I dont know what to say. This weblog is great. Thats not genuinely a truly massive statement, but its all I could come up with after reading this. You know so significantly about this subject. So considerably so that you created me want to find out a lot more about it. Your blog is my stepping stone, my friend. Thanks for the heads up on this subject.
“Llstuler’s Blog” ended up being a really nice posting, . Continue publishing and I will continue following! I appreciate it -Rhonda
…….but I still have the Constitution as my protection of direct taxes. The Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land”. Sorry but I have no obligation to file income taxes on any government tax form, for if I did, I would commit perjury.
Your style is really unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from. Many thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this page.
Muy agradable e informativo artículo desde todos los ángulos. Por favor enviar más!
great submit, very informative. I wonder why the
other experts of this sector don’t notice this. You should continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!
this blog is very refreshing, there is nothing that this GOV can do that would faze me anymore. i will adding to this blog info i have and what i know. this SSN fraud in the usa by this GOV. is not new, i friend of mine, IRWIN SCHIFF, wrote THE SOCIAL SECURITY SWINDLE years back now. he is currently a federal guest and “political prisoner”. Llstuler’s thank you for this BLOG of yours and i will be following it. Howard
Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your website is very cool.
Im impressed by the details that youve on this website. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject.
Bookmarked this website page, will come back for more articles.
You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the information I already
searched all over the place and simply couldnt come
across. What an ideal web-site.
You are so interesting! I don’t believe I have read something like that before. So good to find someone with original thoughts on this topic. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This site is one thing that is required on the web, someone with a bit of originality!
Social security as well as the income tax only applies to federal persons under the law. A recent letter from Congressman Dennis A. Ross to one of his constituents of the 15th District of Florida, said in his personal letterhead from Washington D.C., that the current tax Code does not state individual American’s liability for payment of federal taxes. This statement aligns with Subtitle C, 26 U.S.C., where this subtitle concerns employment tax and income tax collected at source, and where a “employee” is defined as a federal worker. The federal worker does not have to pay the taxes if they so choose. Section 3402(n) allows a federal employee to claim exempt because he/she had no liability for tax in the preceding year or the current year. (Note that subtitle A of 26 U.S.C. has no section in that subtitle that makes anyone “made liable” for income taxes. There is a tax imposed upon every individual in section 1, but the mere imposition of a tax does not make anyone “liable”.) In section 3402(p) a federal employee can make him/herself “liable” for the federal tax by making a “voluntary agreement” with the employer (Government). But foremost of all, American’s are protected by the Constitution at Article 1, section 2, clause 3, section 9, clause 4. And the 16th amendment was created to show that income could be taxed without apportionment in the states, but taxed only as a indirect or excise tax on profits and gains of federal corporate activity. If you are a corporation or employee as a non-federal person, you have no obligation for payment of federal taxes, and if you volunteer to pay the tax, you will commit perjury.
The choice is yours, either pay the tax unlawfully and lose what is rightfully your money, or stop paying the tax and keep what is lawfully rightfully yours.
C.P.A. and Enrolled Agents are absolutely ignorant of the tax laws and regulations and are nothing less than an extension of the IRS corruption system.
Federal courts have prosecuted non-federal persons without due process of law and have sent them off to long term federal prison time such as Irwin Schiff. If you think the courts serve real justice, then you have no knowledge of the law because corrupt federal judges such as Kent Dawson, refused to allow Irwin Schiff to defend himself pro se. Just read many of his transcripts on the web and see for yourself just how corrupt the DOJ really is.
There are two well known law maxims everyone should be aware of. 1. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. 2. If a law cannot be easily read and understood, it is VOID for vagueness.
I enjoy what you guys are up too. Such clever work
and reporting! Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve you guys to blogroll.
This is all very eye opening to me, it goes very much in line with thoughts and beliefs I have held for many years. However I cannot help but notice the obvious, how do you make this ideology work? The fundamental facts are that we live in a country governed by a huge entity that controls every aspect of what we do. For example I’ve read that revoking your SSN basically terminates your employment to the federal government and that this is doable as long as you still adhere to and do not break any laws along the way. How does one obtain a license to operate a vehicle? According to what I’ve read here and unless I’m wrong, by taking yourself out of this corporation you are no longer bound by their law, though you must be observant of it. According to federal and state in order to operate a motor vehicle you must hold a license. Do you just quit driving or do you do so as a free man within your own set of guidelines as you wish? If so you are breaking a law, maybe not a law that you choose to accept but face the facts you live here and function albeit on the sidelines in a place that is controlled by an overwhelming entity of federal government, state government and people that are all Employees of said corporation. How do you manage that? I love what you are writing about and am not trying to argue in any fashion against it. I am however confused as to how an individual once they revoke their employment in this corporation can live, make money, own land or any other simple thing that you would take for granted do on a day to day basis. I would also love to know if once you revoke that SSN are you able to petition to get back what has been taken from you in the form of lawful monies? I can picture the look of dismay on a social security employees face when you ask them for a check for the total amount you’ve paid in over your life….not likely to go over well I’m certain. As to my ignorance on these questions, please point me in the correct direction. As a 47 year old father of 6 it would give me no greater pleasure than to be able to give my children the promise of hope, freedom and liberty as our forefathers meant it to be.
Crockett,
Yes, your concerns are real. In the long run it is simply a matter of educating the public. However, in the meantime here’s something that will maybe interest you. In my personal case I received a letter in 1995 from the Chief of the Collection Branch of the IRS in Philadelphia stating that I was not legally required to file a 1040. That’s because I had paid my Social Security earnings, but I had not filed a 1040. When you applied for a SS#, you made an agreement with the IRS to collect Social Security – this is a gross income tax and the only authority the IRS has is to collect it. The “income tax” that you file on a 1040 is a net income tax and, as the gov’t has always stated, it’s voluntary (that’s why the exemplification of the definition of “U.S. citizen” is found where it is – under the gift tax statutes at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c)). The entry point is title 26 USC section 3121(l) – that’s a small “l”. The implementing regulations are 26 CFR part 31. I don’t have the actual sections in front of me, but if you go to part 31 of title 26 CFR, it will reference part 36. It is here that the ONLY reference to the IRS is found in the Internal Revenue Code.
Now, the federal gov’t being what it is attacked me for willful failure to file! But to bring the indictment against me the IRS had to falsify SS earnings and then falsify IMF tax records and further commit perjury through the DA’s suborning of said perjury. After a few days the jury was told by the judge to find me guilty. Now I didn’t know all of this back then, so I learned all that I know since then.
There’s a lot more to know, but suffice to say the federal gov’t has set up a fantasy land to make everything “legal”. So your birth certificate makes you a “U.S. citizen”, a person born in one of the States who then establishes a residence in Puerto Rico and further acquires Puerto Rican citizenship (I believe that it further establishes a personal holding company as the birth certificate is issued by the Dept of Commerce (foreign commerce)). Then you become a federal employee, the “taxpayer”, by applying for a SS#. You are now in the Merchant Marine (definition of “taxpayer”) and a federal employee. The combination of “U.S. citizen” and “taxpayer” makes you a “U.S. resident” and you are now a slave. But even as the slave, you can simply file your SS earnings and ignore the 1040. I would suggest that you file a Freedom of Information Act request for you IMF transcripts and then download the IRS 6209 (from their website) which explains the codes that you’ll find on your transcripts. If you’ve been filing 1040’s you will find a “TC-150” transaction code on your transcripts for each year. That is your Virgin Island tax liability. That’s what my records indicated long ago. When I stopped filing a 1040 and then filed a Freedom of Information Act request for my IMF transcripts there was no “TC150”, but instead they had “TC590” codes – that means not liable this period to file (from the IRS 6209).
But before you undertake anything remember that the federal gov’t is simply a bankrupt corporation under the control of the international counterfeiters – these people are nothing but a bunch of lying, cheating, thieves on a good day. They own the federal judges and the Dept of Justice and will not want this info to be exploited.
It’s rather simple to know that Title 26 is not for anyone that is not federally employed. It is the Internal Revenue Code that the IRS enforces and a simple reading of the plain language of subtitle A, you’ll see that there is absolutely no liability for the income tax. Then in subtitle C, you’ll read that the social security tax which is nothing more than federal employment tax, and income tax collected at source, is only collected from federal employees that have voluntarily paid these two taxes. Non-federal persons are excluded, and the next two sections, section 3403 and 3404, reflect the Governmental employer being liable for collection, making a tax return, and payment of taxes.
American’s that are not federally employed and that pay the income tax, commit perjury when signing a federal tax form under oath of under the penalties of perjury.
Many American’s say that they don’t mind paying the tax because they will get a refund, after filing. Yes, they get a refund but without interest. It’s like having a bank savings account that earns no interest.
Hootowl,
We all have been brainwashed to believe that we are subject to the federal gov’t regulatory agencies. But the truth is that we have 2 major enslavement contracts in place to make the brainwashing concepts take hold. Fist the birth certificate makes you a person born in one of the States who then establishes a Puerto Rican residence and further acquires Puerto Rican citizenship (see 26 USC 2501(b) and the exemplification at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c)). This is the definition of “U.S. citizen”. Second the Social Security number – the Form “SS-5” is a federal employment contract. This makes the applicant a “taxpayer”, a person in the Merchant Marine (see 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5)). The combination of these two terms, “taxpayer” and “U.S. citizen”, is a “U.S. resident”. The “U.S. resident” is a gov’t slave – it’s the term used in the IRS indictment, school tax, property taxes, the Census questionnaire, etc.
“Employee” is a legal term. “Employee” means a gov’t employee – 26 USC section 7701(j), “Tax treatment of Federal Thrift Saving Fund”. Subsection (1), “In general”, states “For the purposes of this title”. Then subsection (4), “Definitions”, states “For purposes of this subsection” and then states that the term “employee” has the same meaning as in subchapter III of chapter 84 of title 5, which is Government Organizations and Employees. Only a federal employee is subject to federal employment taxes.
If I’m a federal employee, then the government owes me about 56 years of wages that I have not received.
Actually there is an undistributed dividend that is assigned to you – this dividend conveys the necessary requirement that you be a collector of internal duties (alcohol) and that makes you liable for income taxes. Read my Post entitled “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code”.
Title 26 and the implementing regulations is the law that the IRS is required to enforce, so you can forget about all of the other U.S. Codes.
The IRS commits criminal acts when litigating liens and levies of Title 26, as they never cite the implementing regulations which are provided by GPO Access, in the parallel table of authorities. There is no 26 C.F.R. implementing regulations for the lien and levy of 26 U.S.C.
Again, you should read the Post on this Blog titled “How to Read the Internal Revenue Code”. You will find that all the statutes that you are citing are actually implemented by title 27, “Intoxicating Liquors”. You are being assigned an undistributed dividend that conveys the necessary requirement to file income taxes in the gov’t’s fantasy world created by the birth certificate and the Social Security card.
llstuler–Thank you so much for your wonderful, in-depth information. WOW!
I’m on the verge of retirement and definitely need to sign up to start receiving “money” from the SSA. Do you have any advice or leads to any sites where I can get info about the best way to do so–meaning: protecting myself from adhesion contracts, etc., that further mire me in the corporation?
Bless you.
Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve
Dear Genevieve,
Since you have honored your contract and have paid into SS, then you are lawfully entitled to your money. As to being further mired in the corporation, the Affordable Care Act is nothing more than an extension of FICA – that’s why the IRS is the collection agency.
The social security number that your mother and/or father were told to register for you, on your behalf, as an infant or minor child [their offspring], is totally illegal because you did not enter into that contract for yourself, by yourself, nor did you have any knowledge of it. It is a fact of contractual law that in order for any and all contracts to be legitimate concerning the parties to it, they had to enter into that contract Willingly, Knowingly, and Voluntarily. Since it cannot be said that you did Knowingly, Willingly, and Voluntarily enter into any contract as an infant or minor child, then there cannot be any contract which exists from the time alleged.
Furthermore it is illegal for an infant or minor child to enter into any and all contracts by law before they are of the age of consent. Your mother nor your father cannot enter you in a fiduciary agreement, in your name, on your behalf, which alleges to take affect years in the future. This is obviously a fraud. This makes the issuance of any social security number to an infant, or on behalf of an infant, or any young person, before the age of consent, to constitute as an act of fraud.
There is a so-called “Baby Act”, perhaps known as Black’s Law (I’m not sure), that addresses this concern of yours. I haven’t as yet looked into this myself, but I believe that this is worth checking out. It supposedly addresses the exact points of law that you have stated.